IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v17y2014i3p306-322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information system requirements: a flow-based diagram versus supplementation of use case narratives with activity diagrams

Author

Listed:
  • Sabah Al-Fedaghi

Abstract

In developing information system requirements, the exclusive usage of use-case narratives to describe a system's behaviour can cause difficulties for developers who want to ensure a complete description of the embedded process logic. This problem is an instance of the general problem of multiplicity of diagrammatic models in UML instead of a single, integrated diagrammatic model that incorporates function, structure, and behaviour. One approach suggests supplementing use-case narratives with activity diagrams. This paper is a contribution to understanding this ongoing desire to supplement diagrammatic methods with each other, apparently to compensate for the lack of thoroughness of requirements representation in higher-level views of a system. The paper proposes a general solution to the problem by developing a conceptual representation of requirements based on a new flow-based diagrammatic model. To demonstrate this approach in a specific context, the paper focuses on a single attempt to supplement a use-case narrative with activity diagrams by recasting it in terms of the flow-based solution. The results indicate that the use-case narrative not only is incomplete in details, but also may have chronological gaps.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabah Al-Fedaghi, 2014. "Information system requirements: a flow-based diagram versus supplementation of use case narratives with activity diagrams," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(3), pages 306-322.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:17:y:2014:i:3:p:306-322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=64975
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:17:y:2014:i:3:p:306-322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.