IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v17y2014i1p112-128.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors affecting balanced scorecard usage

Author

Listed:
  • Majidul Islam
  • Yi-Feng Yang
  • Yu-Jia Hu
  • Cheng-Se Hsu

Abstract

The paper aims to focus on antecedents of the individual-level determinants of the model as opposed to firm-level determinants and how this might contribute to greater understanding for the implementation of the balanced scorecard (BSC). The paper is based on an empirical study of the data collected using the Dunn and Bradstreet database through a survey questionnaire. The analysis of the data shows that the awareness of BSC capabilities is positively associated with the adoption of the BSC. This is the most important variable leading to the adoption of the BSC by the sample companies. The current research has tried to make use of and discussed the available research in this area and has provided an antecedent to and direction for the implementation of the BSC. Though more empirical research is needed to generalise the findings, the current research has identified some factors and future research that may be undertaken in that direction.

Suggested Citation

  • Majidul Islam & Yi-Feng Yang & Yu-Jia Hu & Cheng-Se Hsu, 2014. "Factors affecting balanced scorecard usage," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(1), pages 112-128.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:17:y:2014:i:1:p:112-128
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=64125
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:17:y:2014:i:1:p:112-128. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.