IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v16y2014i1p72-88.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Positivism in information systems: investigating paradox between theory and practice in IS researches

Author

Listed:
  • Amir Manian
  • Mona Jamporazmey
  • Mohammad Hussein Sherkat

Abstract

Beliefs and assumptions of IS researchers significantly affect research manner. Any research project is based on philosophical assumptions about world nature and how to gather knowledge about world. Often, these assumptions have been considered implicit and incontestable. By considering many researches conducted in IS field, little researches has done to discuss about research foundations and philosophical grounds. Paradigm gives solidarity to IS domain and distinguishes it from other field. The main objective of this paper is to examine effect of positivism in IS and identified strength aspects and challenges of applying positivism in this domain. Finally, the paper seeks to answer the paradox between theory and practice in philosophical assumptions in IS field. To gain this goal, the meta-analysis of articles related to IS paradigm is conducted. The results show while many IS philosophical papers criticised applying positivism in IS, yet this paradigm remain prevailing approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Amir Manian & Mona Jamporazmey & Mohammad Hussein Sherkat, 2014. "Positivism in information systems: investigating paradox between theory and practice in IS researches," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(1), pages 72-88.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:16:y:2014:i:1:p:72-88
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=60837
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:16:y:2014:i:1:p:72-88. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.