IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbisy/v10y2012i3p312-327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tax software acceptance: how do professional users differ from novices?

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander McLeod
  • Sonja Pippin

Abstract

This paper explores how performance expectations, anticipated learning curve, social influences, privacy concerns, and risk perceptions affect taxpayers' intention to use tax preparation software. We contribute to the extensive technology acceptance literature in three ways. First, we investigate whether perception and acceptance of tax software is different for professional accountants ('experts') compared to the general public ('novices'). Second, we assess the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model in the novel context of individual tax preparation and confirm the theory's ability to explain technology use outside the 'traditional' environment of business organisations. Third, we include constructs related to privacy and risk and test this extension of the technology acceptance model. Results indicate dissimilarities between the two subject groups and suggest the technology acceptance model may not be equally applicable to experts and novices.

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander McLeod & Sonja Pippin, 2012. "Tax software acceptance: how do professional users differ from novices?," International Journal of Business Information Systems, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 10(3), pages 312-327.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:10:y:2012:i:3:p:312-327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=47533
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbisy:v:10:y:2012:i:3:p:312-327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=172 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.