IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbire/v8y2014i1p52-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ranking the barriers of knowledge management adoption in supply chain using fuzzy AHP method

Author

Listed:
  • Sachin K. Patil
  • Ravi Kant

Abstract

Supply chain (SC) needs to develop knowledge to gain competitive advantage. However, mere possession of knowledge does not guarantee an edge in competition. Knowledge management (KM) plays an important role in SC to create, build, maintain and utilise knowledge to achieve competitive advantage. The aim of this paper is to identify and prioritise the barriers of KM adoption in SC. It helps organisations to concentrate on high rank barriers and develop strategies to tackle them on priority. To do so, fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method is proposed in this paper. Also empirical study presented to illustrate the proposed method and demonstrate its usefulness. A total of 28 barriers were identified through literature review and expert's opinion. These barriers were categorised into five major criteria. The result of the study indicates that 'lack of top management commitment', 'KM not integrated in business processes' and 'lack of proper organisational structure to create and share knowledge' are the three most important barriers of KM adoption in SC. The case organisation should overcome these barriers with higher priority for effective KM adoption in SC.

Suggested Citation

  • Sachin K. Patil & Ravi Kant, 2014. "Ranking the barriers of knowledge management adoption in supply chain using fuzzy AHP method," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 52-75.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:52-75
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=58047
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:8:y:2014:i:1:p:52-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=203 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.