IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbire/v7y2013i3p379-391.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impact of perceived organisational support on job performance among healthcare professionals

Author

Listed:
  • G.N. Sumathi
  • T.J. Kamalanabhan
  • M. Thenmozhi

Abstract

The study examined the impact of perceived organisational support on in-role performance and extra performance towards supervisors, co-workers and patients. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among medical officers and staff nurses working in primary health centres of Tamilnadu. From the results, it is found that perceived organisational support showed a positive impact of on in-role performance and extra role performance. It is found the extra role performance towards patients is greater compared to other job performance measures. The results of the study emphasise the public health department has to identify and reward substantial performers and review welfare policies that are perceived to be unattractive by healthcare professionals.

Suggested Citation

  • G.N. Sumathi & T.J. Kamalanabhan & M. Thenmozhi, 2013. "Impact of perceived organisational support on job performance among healthcare professionals," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(3), pages 379-391.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:7:y:2013:i:3:p:379-391
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=53637
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:7:y:2013:i:3:p:379-391. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=203 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.