IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbire/v7y2013i1p23-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Collaborative R%D in Russian companies: empirical evidence on successful partnerships

Author

Listed:
  • Markus A. Jääskeläinen
  • Juha J. Hinkkanen
  • Juha Väätänen

Abstract

Companies from emerging economies are going global at a growing speed, making the competition over customers increasingly challenging for all participants. In the modern competitive landscape, a firm's capability to innovate is highly stressed. In this context, interorganisational cooperation has become one of the most important keystones in contemporary business management. Collaborative activities provide broader premises for R%D and innovation activity to create sustained competitive advantage and financial success for business firms. Collaborative R%D, especially in the context of Russian companies, has received only minor academic attention. We have used a survey of 206 Russian companies to analyse the R%D cooperation setup implemented in companies that are gaining success in markets, as well the common breadth and depth of these partnerships. The results reveal that the demand for differing R%D partners in different markets is obvious, as there is a strong dispersion in the importance of different R%D partners with respect to successful operation in different markets. Furthermore, Russian companies succeeding in developed markets form mid- to long-term partnerships for R%D and also reinforce the partnerships with contracts or written agreements on a highly regular basis.

Suggested Citation

  • Markus A. Jääskeläinen & Juha J. Hinkkanen & Juha Väätänen, 2013. "Collaborative R%D in Russian companies: empirical evidence on successful partnerships," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(1), pages 23-39.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:7:y:2013:i:1:p:23-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=50554
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:7:y:2013:i:1:p:23-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=203 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.