IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbire/v6y2012i4p433-457.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The different impact on scientific output of academic-owned vs. academic-invented patents: evidence from a panel of Italian academic inventors

Author

Listed:
  • Bianca Potì
  • Giovanni Cerulli
  • Sandra Romagnosi

Abstract

This paper explores, by means of descriptive and econometric methods, the relation between publishing and patenting at the individual scientist's level in a large multi-faculty university for the period 1999-2005. It studies the relationship between academic patenting and publications count (per researcher per year) and mean citation rate, both at the pooled level and by a distinction between university- and firm-owned academic patents. Coherently with the current empirical literature, the results show a positive and significant effect of patenting on publications and citations, although with different intensity over time lags. Our paper goes beyond these results (well established in the literature) and detects the existence of differentiated impacts for three main types of academic patents: privately owned, publicly owned and other patents (including those individually owned and with mixed private-public ownership). According to our results, scientists patenting with industries are more productive in terms of scientific output after the patenting event.

Suggested Citation

  • Bianca Potì & Giovanni Cerulli & Sandra Romagnosi, 2012. "The different impact on scientific output of academic-owned vs. academic-invented patents: evidence from a panel of Italian academic inventors," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 6(4), pages 433-457.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:6:y:2012:i:4:p:433-457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=47276
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:6:y:2012:i:4:p:433-457. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Carmel O'Grady) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Carmel O'Grady to update the entry or send us the correct email address. General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=203 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.