IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbire/v26y2021i1p1-19.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Academic consulting and innovational output: framework for research

Author

Listed:
  • Tanmoy Roy
  • Pankaj Madan

Abstract

The paper investigates the types of academic consulting practices being done across the world based on the systematic review literature. The paper aims to propose a theoretical framework of academic consulting and also discusses various factors and sub-factors that influence academic consulting. Strong literature support was found for these factors and subfactors. This paper proposes several hypotheses that establish the key relationships between the factors and academic consulting and the key innovative output of the consulting method. The proposed theoretical framework exhibits how the consulting method having impacts on the institution, industry, and individual. To test the theoretical framework, we conducted a pilot survey by taking 100 respondents from academic institutions (PhD research scholars, assistant professors, associate professors, professors) in four metropolitan cities of India and also researchers who are in research and development (R%D) units of any industry and applied chi-square test on the collected data and results validate the theoretical framework of the consulting method.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanmoy Roy & Pankaj Madan, 2021. "Academic consulting and innovational output: framework for research," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 26(1), pages 1-19.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:26:y:2021:i:1:p:1-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=117738
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:26:y:2021:i:1:p:1-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=203 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.