IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbire/v17y2018i3p320-341.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Proposition of a systematics to qualify the cross-functional collaboration through the organisational communication for the development of services

Author

Listed:
  • Lisiane Caroline Rodrigues Hermes
  • Gunnar Gustavo Trindade
  • Cassiana Maris Lima Cruz
  • Janine Fleith De Medeiros

Abstract

The interfunctional collaboration configures one of the success-driving factors for the innovation market. However, the collaboration between different areas of the organisation is characterised by intangibility. Thus, coordination mechanisms between them must be formalised. In light of the exposed issue and considering the increasing competition in the higher education sector in Brazil, the present study seeks to comprehend how the service development occurs within a university, analysing convergences and divergences in the managers' speeches of the involved areas in order to, consequently, propose improvements. The research we conducted is explanatory and qualitative. The results allow us to affirm that the analysed institution does not have a formalised service development, as well as interfunctional collaboration presents gaps for being informal. As the main contribution, a systematics is proposed to qualify interfunctional collaboration through organisational communication practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisiane Caroline Rodrigues Hermes & Gunnar Gustavo Trindade & Cassiana Maris Lima Cruz & Janine Fleith De Medeiros, 2018. "Proposition of a systematics to qualify the cross-functional collaboration through the organisational communication for the development of services," International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(3), pages 320-341.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:17:y:2018:i:3:p:320-341
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=95540
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbire:v:17:y:2018:i:3:p:320-341. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=203 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.