IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbglo/v9y2012i3p260-274.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A critical thinking challenge for the chief of staff: a case study

Author

Listed:
  • Kenneth Long
  • Eric Morrison
  • Melanie Lawler

Abstract

A military college for organisational-level leaders identified the improvement of the critical thinking (CT) curriculum as a high priority. The first cycle of design, development and implementation was not successful due to a lack of time and assembling a team that did not have representation from all teaching departments, curriculum developers, and operations staff. After conducting a detailed after action review and an appreciative sharing of knowledge (ASK) project to understand what had happened, the college's chief of staff had to develop a strategy to plan for a second cycle of design to develop a critical thinking course that could be successfully integrated into the year-long academic programme of each teaching department within the college. The chief of staff was faced with a complex social and technical challenge with many different stakeholders. This case study examines those challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Kenneth Long & Eric Morrison & Melanie Lawler, 2012. "A critical thinking challenge for the chief of staff: a case study," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(3), pages 260-274.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbglo:v:9:y:2012:i:3:p:260-274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=50366
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbglo:v:9:y:2012:i:3:p:260-274. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=245 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.