IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbglo/v40y2025i2p107-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cognitive biases in innovation ecosystems: global luxury fashion on the eve of post COVID-19 recovery

Author

Listed:
  • Manel Arribas-Ibar
  • Nuria Arimany-Serrat
  • Petra A. Nylund

Abstract

Luxury fashion is an innovation ecosystem experiencing great change, and the COVID-19 pandemic has accentuated some of these dynamics. With roots in a traditional industry, certain cognitive barriers impede interaction within the luxury fashion ecosystem. We therefore analyse the factors that drive innovation and technological change through an inductive case study of this specific ecosystem. We identify and analyse six biases within the luxury fashion ecosystem that are affecting the cognitive barriers of the ecosystem. Consequentially, we propose that consumer bias impedes a transition from the traditional luxury customer to a more differentiated consumer. Market-segmentation bias can hinder necessary micro-segmentation to reflect new needs. Product bias obscures possible product innovation due to excessive brand focus. Sourcing bias toward traditional partners slows the move towards sustainability. Second-hand market bias stops fashion brands from fully exploiting circular business models. Finally, ambidexterity bias may block the exploration of new markets necessary following a crisis. Implications for research and practice are discussed, including the need to develop more adaptive and flexible strategies through open innovation that adapts to the phases of recovery from the pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Manel Arribas-Ibar & Nuria Arimany-Serrat & Petra A. Nylund, 2025. "Cognitive biases in innovation ecosystems: global luxury fashion on the eve of post COVID-19 recovery," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 40(2), pages 107-129.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbglo:v:40:y:2025:i:2:p:107-129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=146217
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbglo:v:40:y:2025:i:2:p:107-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=245 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.