IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbglo/v20y2018i3p394-415.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A profile of social enterprise in Brazil based on theoretical differences from and similarities with US, European, and emerging country perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Iraci De Souza João
  • Alexandre Bevilacqua Leoneti
  • Heitor Bassi Dos Santos
  • Simone Vasconcelos Ribeiro Galina

Abstract

The topic of social enterprise (SE) has gained much attention in academic and business discussions, but knowledge concerning SE is still incipient in Brazil. Our objective is to identify the profile of and to verify which of the three SE perspectives Brazilian SE resembles. In total, 730 social organisations were identified in Brazil through the available public data, from which 84 SEs were randomly selected for descriptive statistics collection and analysis using the binomial hypotheses test. The profile adopted in Brazil is unique, with few similarities with the US perspective. The Brazilian SEs has diversified operations, is legally known as companies and has up to ten employees on average. Our work provides a profile of Brazilian SEs, filling a gap in the literature. It promotes a reflection on the capacity of the emerging country perspective to reflect the reality of the SEs located in developing countries.

Suggested Citation

  • Iraci De Souza João & Alexandre Bevilacqua Leoneti & Heitor Bassi Dos Santos & Simone Vasconcelos Ribeiro Galina, 2018. "A profile of social enterprise in Brazil based on theoretical differences from and similarities with US, European, and emerging country perspectives," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(3), pages 394-415.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbglo:v:20:y:2018:i:3:p:394-415
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=91513
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbglo:v:20:y:2018:i:3:p:394-415. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=245 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.