IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbglo/v13y2014i3p307-321.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of globalisation by non-traditional adult students in the USA

Author

Listed:
  • Emmanuel Jean Francois

Abstract

This study investigated the perceptions of globalisation by non-traditional students in the USA through an intercultural and interdisciplinary perspective. The study involved non-traditional American and international students at several US colleges and universities. A qualitative approach, including interviews and focus group techniques, was used to collect the data. The participants acknowledged some positive effects as well as their discontents about globalisation. However, the meanings of the discontents about globalisation differed based on the students' intercultural backgrounds and discipline of study. Non-traditional adult American students saw the offshore outsourcing practices of US businesses as a threat for the US economy and hegemony in the world. Non-traditional international students in the US perceived globalisation as a transnational exploitation of working class in developing countries. Students in business related programmes had more favourable views of globalisation compared to those in human and social sciences. This underscores the implication that discontents about globalisation may not be properly understood exclusively in terms of industrialised versus developing countries, but also in the context of an intercultural and cross-disciplinary frame.

Suggested Citation

  • Emmanuel Jean Francois, 2014. "Perceptions of globalisation by non-traditional adult students in the USA," International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 13(3), pages 307-321.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbglo:v:13:y:2014:i:3:p:307-321
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=64678
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbglo:v:13:y:2014:i:3:p:307-321. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=245 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.