IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbget/v20y2026i7p1-19.html

Unethical leadership in the South African public sector tender processes through the lens of game theory

Author

Listed:
  • Thato Thagakane
  • Tyanai Masiya
  • Stellah Lubinga
  • Kenny Chiwarawara

Abstract

The study examined the challenges of unethical leadership in the South African public sector tender processes after majority rule in 1994. Empirical research unravelling challenges of the South African public sector tender processes is limited and fragmented. The tendering process assists the public sector in promoting fairness, transparency and efficiency; it also assists in mitigating unethical behaviour associated with public procurement. This study employed a qualitative approach using a thematic analysis and drew upon secondary sources. The findings of this study highlighted the multifaceted challenges facing South Africa's public sector tender processes, including bribery, bid rigging, ghost payments, discrimination, financial misconduct, lack of impartiality and transparency, and patronage. These affirm the assumptions in game theory, notably rationality, self-interest, strategic behaviour and perfect information. Addressing these challenges requires a comprehensive approach involving legislative reforms, strengthened oversight mechanisms, enhanced transparency and accountability, and a commitment to ethical leadership and good governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Thato Thagakane & Tyanai Masiya & Stellah Lubinga & Kenny Chiwarawara, 2026. "Unethical leadership in the South African public sector tender processes through the lens of game theory," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(7), pages 1-19.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:20:y:2026:i:7:p:1-19
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=151978
    Download Restriction: Open Access
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:20:y:2026:i:7:p:1-19. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=70 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.