IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbget/v19y2025i3-4p406-431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Business strategy, enterprise risk management, organisational innovation performance and organisational performance: comparing fsQCA with PLS-SEM

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen Vinh Khuong
  • Le Huu Tuan Anh
  • Luong Ho Quynh Giang
  • Le Thi Thuan An
  • Nguyen Le Ngoc Hang
  • Pham Van Nguyen
  • Huynh Le Hoang Nhi

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to clarify the relationship between business strategy (BS), enterprise risk management (ERM), organisational innovation performance (OIP), and organisational performance (OP) in Vietnam. We also compare the PLS-SEM findings to a recently developed panel data fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis technique (fsQCA). According to the findings, the BS factor has a substantial impact on OP. The ERM factor mediates the relationship between BS and OP along with the relationship between BS and OIP. In the link between BS and OP, as well as the relationship between ERM and OP, the OIP factor serves as an intermediate. This work adds to the scientific literature by providing empirical evidence with a deeper understanding of the level of influence and importance of using a combination of BS and risk management implementation to improve OP in the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen Vinh Khuong & Le Huu Tuan Anh & Luong Ho Quynh Giang & Le Thi Thuan An & Nguyen Le Ngoc Hang & Pham Van Nguyen & Huynh Le Hoang Nhi, 2025. "Business strategy, enterprise risk management, organisational innovation performance and organisational performance: comparing fsQCA with PLS-SEM," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 19(3/4), pages 406-431.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:19:y:2025:i:3/4:p:406-431
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=146331
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:19:y:2025:i:3/4:p:406-431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=70 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.