IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbget/v17y2023i4p471-494.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Good governance, bad governance: a refinement and application of key governance concepts

Author

Listed:
  • Scott L. Mitchell
  • Mark D. Packard
  • Brent B. Clark

Abstract

Understanding what makes governance 'good' or 'bad' has been impeded by construct ambiguity. Contemporary governance research has struggled to define 'governance' and related constructs such as 'ownership', 'agency', and 'management' in a way that clearly separates and distinguishes them. Often, the line between governance and management is so blurred that it is impossible to say what is good or bad 'governance' versus 'management'. Here we provide a systematic classification of key governance concepts in terms of their distinct economic functions. 'Governance', for instance, is the economic function of behavioural constraint. This allows us to state what 'good' governance is and how it might be assessed. We conclude that goodness of governance is idiosyncratic to each organisation, or even to each owner. Thus, while objective measures of good governance are possible, broadly utilised criteria for measuring governance are unlikely to capture whether governance is actually good or bad.

Suggested Citation

  • Scott L. Mitchell & Mark D. Packard & Brent B. Clark, 2023. "Good governance, bad governance: a refinement and application of key governance concepts," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 17(4), pages 471-494.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:17:y:2023:i:4:p:471-494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=132119
    Download Restriction: Open Access
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:17:y:2023:i:4:p:471-494. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=70 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.