IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbget/v15y2021i2p153-168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Settling debts in the supply chain: do prompt payment codes make a difference? A UK study

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher J. Cowton
  • Leire San-Jose

Abstract

Trade credit has only recently been taken seriously by business ethicists, despite the common practice of slow payment of suppliers. In response, the UK has introduced a series of voluntary 'payment codes'. However, at the time to which our data relate, relatively few FTSE 100 companies had signed up. Furthermore, although signatories paid more quickly, the difference was not statistically significant. These two findings might appear to suggest that payment codes are ineffective. However, some companies claimed to be following a code which was defunct. Their payment speed was indistinguishable from non-signatories, but those that had signed the extant code paid significantly more quickly. Our findings not only suggest that a payment code might be effective but also show a result relevant to codes of ethics more generally - that there might be signs that a company is not taking a code seriously, which we identify with the notion of hypocrisy.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher J. Cowton & Leire San-Jose, 2021. "Settling debts in the supply chain: do prompt payment codes make a difference? A UK study," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(2), pages 153-168.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:15:y:2021:i:2:p:153-168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=113945
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:15:y:2021:i:2:p:153-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=70 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.