IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbget/v12y2017i3p262-288.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Power relationships in gender-related disclosures: exploring language in selected Fortune 500 companies' sustainability reports

Author

Listed:
  • Dewan Mahboob Hossain
  • Nik Nazli Nik Ahmad
  • Siti Alawiah Siraj

Abstract

This research investigates power relationships in the disclosure on women and gender related issues in corporate sustainability reports. For this purpose fifty two companies from the 2013 Fortune top 100 list were selected. Critical discourse analysis (CDA) was conducted on the basis of Fairclough's (1989) framework. Fairclough suggested analysing the language from three dimensions: text, process and social. Through CDA the notions of power and hegemony were identified and explained with the help of Bourdieu's cultural capital as suggested by Everett (2004) and Aaken et al. (2012). The research concludes that discourses on women and gender carry the traditional patriarchal notions and reflect traditional ideas about women prevailing in most of the societies. Women were presented as a distressed species and companies tried to portray themselves as the saviours of women. The findings of this research contribute to the critical accounting literature by highlighting the strategic use of language in relation to gender issues by large global corporations.

Suggested Citation

  • Dewan Mahboob Hossain & Nik Nazli Nik Ahmad & Siti Alawiah Siraj, 2017. "Power relationships in gender-related disclosures: exploring language in selected Fortune 500 companies' sustainability reports," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(3), pages 262-288.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:12:y:2017:i:3:p:262-288
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=88254
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:12:y:2017:i:3:p:262-288. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=70 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.