IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbget/v12y2017i3p218-240.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The internal auditing of corporate governance, risk management and ethics: comparing banks with other industries

Author

Listed:
  • Silvia Ferramosca
  • Giuseppe D'Onza
  • Marco Allegrini

Abstract

This paper empirically tests whether the internal auditing function (IAF) in banks is more focused on corporate governance, risk management and ethics than it is in other industries. This study is grounded on theory triangulation, which involves agency, institutional and contingency theory. The results indicate that banks are more likely than other industries to devote auditing activities to corporate governance, risk management and ethics. With reference to risk management internal auditors in banks are more likely to cover the following areas of responsibility relating to risk: assurance on individual risks; assurance on risk management system as a whole and advice/consulting on risk management. As predicted, banks are more likely to have a corporate ethics policy (i.e., a code of ethics or conduct). Nevertheless, there is no significant difference between banks and other industries regarding the amount of ethics-related auditing.

Suggested Citation

  • Silvia Ferramosca & Giuseppe D'Onza & Marco Allegrini, 2017. "The internal auditing of corporate governance, risk management and ethics: comparing banks with other industries," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(3), pages 218-240.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:12:y:2017:i:3:p:218-240
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=88245
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Konstantinos Petridis & Georgios Drogalas & Eleni Zografidou, 2021. "Internal auditor selection using a TOPSIS/non-linear programming model," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 513-539, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:12:y:2017:i:3:p:218-240. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=70 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.