IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbget/v12y2017i1p1-20.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Value relevance and codes of ethics: an empirical analysis of Italian listed companies

Author

Listed:
  • Carlo Caserio
  • Francesco Napoli

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to provide empirical evidence regarding the value relevance of Italian listed companies' codes of ethics. The literature describes several studies investigating the value relevance of single non-financial ethic-related variables, but we cannot find any study aimed at examining the value relevance of codes of ethics and, therefore, this paper tries to fill this research gap. The main idea of this research is that a code of ethics, seen as a 'summarisation' of ethical variables, might be value relevant in the same way as single ethic-related information. Our hypotheses state that codes of ethics may be value relevant: 1) if the first adoption of the code of ethics is value relevant; 2) if the quality of the code of ethics is value relevant. We tested our hypotheses on the first 100 companies listed on the Italian Stock Exchange, in the years 2002-2011. Empirical results show that our hypotheses are verified. The paper also provides insights for future research and further developments.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlo Caserio & Francesco Napoli, 2017. "Value relevance and codes of ethics: an empirical analysis of Italian listed companies," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:12:y:2017:i:1:p:1-20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=85238
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:12:y:2017:i:1:p:1-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=70 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.