IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbget/v11y2016i1p21-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reconstructing IT governance using Foucault

Author

Listed:
  • Gerard L. Ilott

Abstract

At a time when information and its related technology have never been more important for the conduct of commerce, the question 'what is IT governance?' is far from settled. This paper reviews the first decade of IT governance research and its antecedent literature to obtain a better understanding of how the concept has developed, and why there are tensions and inconsistencies in our understanding of what IT governance is. This paper then introduces IT governance through the lens of Michel Foucault's archeological method and historical periods called epistemes. Some historical events will be analysed to demonstrate that when Michel Foucault's techniques of archaeology are applied, a fuller conceptualisation of IT governance is achieved. The demands and expectations of IT governance have been influenced by changes in power and knowledge relations resulting first from the end user computer movement and the increased availability of information and technology, and second from onerous control requirements imposed upon boards of directors by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. An awareness of these influences and how they resulted in different epistemes of IT governance is important for future researchers, allowing them to be more aware of the environment in which IT governance operates.

Suggested Citation

  • Gerard L. Ilott, 2016. "Reconstructing IT governance using Foucault," International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 21-51.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:21-51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=76340
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:11:y:2016:i:1:p:21-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=70 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.