IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbfmi/v3y2017i3p289-308.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forecasting impulse buying behaviour: a comparative study of select five statistical methods

Author

Listed:
  • Sanjeev Prashar
  • Subrata Kumar Mitra

Abstract

Globally, marketers and retailers believe that buying decisions are mostly made inside the store. To capture shoppers' attention and encourage such impulse buying, retailers spend heavily on in-store promotion, product display and store environment, etc. Via this study, the accuracy in predicting impulse buying behaviour using five modelling techniques and utilising R-3.2.1 as a statistical tool, has been tested with data drawn from two major Indian cities. The main objective here is to analyse and compare the capacity of various predicting methods that can be used by retailers and marketers for forecasting sales. Analysis of the data confirmed the predictive ability of the methods, albeit with a varying levels of accuracy. The study provides statistical evidence that support vector machines (SVM) significantly outperforms logistic regression, linear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis and k-nearest neighbour methods in terms of predicting power. The findings offer a number of implications for retailers and marketers. The managerial implications of the study along with scope of further research have been addressed.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanjeev Prashar & Subrata Kumar Mitra, 2017. "Forecasting impulse buying behaviour: a comparative study of select five statistical methods," International Journal of Business Forecasting and Marketing Intelligence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3), pages 289-308.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbfmi:v:3:y:2017:i:3:p:289-308
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=85372
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbfmi:v:3:y:2017:i:3:p:289-308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=156 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.