IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbexc/v4y2011i6p621-644.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical success factors for budgeting systems in the German context: an empirical analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Julia Kornacker
  • Peter Schentler
  • H. James Williams
  • Jaideep Motwani

Abstract

In recent years, the contribution of budgeting to corporate success is being questioned. In spite of this criticism, scholars have hardly presented any context-specific and integrated recommendations about how to design budgeting systems. Instead, most suggestions are mere descriptions of individual aspects which are often based on anecdotal evidence only. This paper provides empirical findings on how companies in Germany organise their budgeting systems and which success factors contribute to an effective and efficient budgeting system. The paper is based on a case study approach. First, four budgeting types are compiled based on an extensive literature review. Second, 12 case studies are used to analyse the configuration of budgeting systems in Germany in order to detect context-specific strengths and weaknesses and to provide recommendations for improvement. The results confirm the four different budgeting types. Their specific configuration is contingent upon company size and rivalry of the industry. The findings provide insights into how to adjust a company's budgeting system to context-specific requirements. Furthermore, it supports managers in the analysis of their budgeting systems and reveals areas for improvement.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia Kornacker & Peter Schentler & H. James Williams & Jaideep Motwani, 2011. "Critical success factors for budgeting systems in the German context: an empirical analysis," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(6), pages 621-644.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:4:y:2011:i:6:p:621-644
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=42903
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:4:y:2011:i:6:p:621-644. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=291 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.