IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbexc/v4y2011i2p225-243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who achieves continuous improvement? TQM implementation in a global organisation

Author

Listed:
  • Kati Tanninen
  • Kaisu Puumalainen
  • Jaana Sandstrom

Abstract

This study aims at clarifying how organisational and environmental characteristics affect the timing of adoption and especially the depth of the implementation of the innovation that improves operations management (TQM). While organisational applications of the theory of innovation diffusion usually concentrate on explaining variations in adoption across organisations, this study explains the implementation phase within one organisation. The developed model for measuring depth of implementation adds value to the paper. A model is built based on the theory of innovation diffusion, and subsequently tested on the following dataset collected from a global process-industry company: 1) a longitudinal data of the continual improvement process; 2) a survey data from 493 respondents. According to our results, timing of adoption has an effect on the depth of the organisational innovation and the developed model for studying the depth worked well. The organisational characteristics had varying effects on the adoption and on the depth of the implementation. Formalisation assists the innovation implementation while interconnectedness, empowering leadership or position in the value chain did not have an effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Kati Tanninen & Kaisu Puumalainen & Jaana Sandstrom, 2011. "Who achieves continuous improvement? TQM implementation in a global organisation," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(2), pages 225-243.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:4:y:2011:i:2:p:225-243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=38790
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:4:y:2011:i:2:p:225-243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=291 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.