IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbexc/v21y2020i4p549-563.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of liquidity risk management in Islamic and conventional banks - an empirical study

Author

Listed:
  • Suleiman Jamal Mohammad
  • Asma Hussein Khalaf Al-Znaimat
  • Abdullah Ahemd Aldaas
  • Asem Tahtamouni

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess liquidity risk management (LRM) practices in Jordanian Islamic and conventional banks during the period (2013-2017). Data used were comprised from six banks, which consisted of three Islamic and three conventional banks in Jordan. Data from the banks financial annual reports covering from 2013-2017 were used to calculate the ratios used as a substitute for liquidity risk in conventional banking as well as Islamic banking in Jordan. The study found the relationship of the size of financial institution, return on asset, return on equity, and capital adequacy ratio with liquidity risk measurement is positive and important both in Islamic banks and conventional banks. Researchers found the practices of LRM are not optimal, yet were based on some considerations explained in this study. Further, progressive actions needs to be taken by the regulators and the banking players to improve the LRM practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Suleiman Jamal Mohammad & Asma Hussein Khalaf Al-Znaimat & Abdullah Ahemd Aldaas & Asem Tahtamouni, 2020. "Assessment of liquidity risk management in Islamic and conventional banks - an empirical study," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(4), pages 549-563.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:21:y:2020:i:4:p:549-563
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=108553
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:21:y:2020:i:4:p:549-563. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=291 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.