IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbexc/v21y2020i4p445-466.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers to Six Sigma implementation in Chinese small and medium steel enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Ghaith M. Al-Abdallah
  • Chew V. Lic

Abstract

Six Sigma initiative has been in place for many years now and proven to be an effective methodology that serves to help enterprises achieve bottom-line improvements. Many large enterprises implement Six Sigma successfully and achieve cost saving of millions USD per year, however, it is a rare case that small and medium size enterprise employ Six Sigma methodology. This paper aims to identify the barriers to Six Sigma implementation in Chinese small and medium manufacturing enterprises in the steel industry. Interpretive paradigm was applied utilising qualitative research design, in which interviews were carried out on a convenience sample of small and medium steel enterprises in China. The results show that there are five main barriers to Six Sigma implementation for Chinese small and medium steel enterprise arranged in ascending order: conflict between Six Sigma culture and enterprise culture, the perception of Six Sigma is inefficient, lack of resources to implement Six Sigma, difficult to train or obtain enterprise-wide Six Sigma knowledge, high enterprise quality management system foundations requirements. The discussion, managerial implications and further research recommendations are provided based on the results of the study.

Suggested Citation

  • Ghaith M. Al-Abdallah & Chew V. Lic, 2020. "Barriers to Six Sigma implementation in Chinese small and medium steel enterprises," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(4), pages 445-466.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:21:y:2020:i:4:p:445-466
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=108551
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:21:y:2020:i:4:p:445-466. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=291 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.