IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbexc/v16y2018i3p304-323.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysing the relationship between organisational strategies and effectiveness of human capital management practices

Author

Listed:
  • Hadi Teimouri
  • Kouroush Jenab
  • Kim LaFevor

Abstract

There has been a growing interest among scholars in organisational capitals in recent years. Using the field-descriptive method, this study reports a model for comparative analysis of challenges of organisational strategies in two private and public sectors of Iran's petrochemical industry and its impact on effectiveness of human capitals management practices. Historical study method was used to collect theoretical subjects and field study method was applied to answer to research questions and confirm or reject research hypotheses. There exists a significant difference between effectiveness level of human capitals management practices in areas of organisational strategies in two private and public sectors of petrochemical industry. Analysing the impact of existing challenges of organisational strategies on effectiveness of human capitals management practices shows the reversed relation among the existing challenges of organisational strategies and effectiveness of human capitals management practices in this regard. These results offer implications for future human capital practices inclusive of a proposed comprehensive model of Human Capital Management Strategy as a systemic remedy.

Suggested Citation

  • Hadi Teimouri & Kouroush Jenab & Kim LaFevor, 2018. "Analysing the relationship between organisational strategies and effectiveness of human capital management practices," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 16(3), pages 304-323.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:16:y:2018:i:3:p:304-323
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=95642
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:16:y:2018:i:3:p:304-323. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=291 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.