IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbexc/v15y2018i2p209-221.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived justice in performance appraisal among Vietnamese employees: antecedents and consequences

Author

Listed:
  • Tran Huy Phuong

Abstract

The current study investigates the antecedents and consequences of perceived justice in performance appraisal (PA) among Vietnamese employees. Although PA is popular in Vietnam, few researches to examine the effectiveness of PA practice in Vietnamese company have been reported. This research explores the issue of justice in PA from the employee perspective. Cross-sectional data were collected from full-time employees at various organisations who are enrolling in night-time Master courses using self-reported questionnaires which yielded a final sample size of 546 observations. Results of multiple regression analyses indicate that participative PA, PA training, trust in rater and the use of forced distribution ranking system have been found to influence the perception of procedural and distributive justice in PA. Perception of procedural and distributive justice in PA, in turn, significantly impacts intention to stay with the organisation. The relationships between perceived justice in PA and job performance, however, are partly in contradiction to previous predictions. While perceived distributive justice in PA strongly influences, perception of procedural justice does not influence job performance. Discussion of results and implications are also detailed.

Suggested Citation

  • Tran Huy Phuong, 2018. "Perceived justice in performance appraisal among Vietnamese employees: antecedents and consequences," International Journal of Business Excellence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 15(2), pages 209-221.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:15:y:2018:i:2:p:209-221
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=91920
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbexc:v:15:y:2018:i:2:p:209-221. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=291 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.