IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbenv/v3y2010i3p329-348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How can established firms survive technological discontinuities? A case study on the Japanese rechargeable battery industry

Author

Listed:
  • Masaaki Sakamoto
  • Shuzo Fujimura

Abstract

Quite a number of established firms lose their momentum during the transition phase from a conventional technology to a new technology. How can established firms recover? We attempt to explore this question through a comparative case study analysis in the Japanese rechargeable battery industry. We extensively examine Sanyo, an established firm which recovered after a technology transition, by comparing it to a newcomer, Sony. We also compare it to Matsushita Battery, an established firm which did not successfully recover. These analyses lead to the following conclusions: There are conditions that give them opportunities for recovery. New applications or new attributes are often triggered by the introduction to the market of a new technology. This is a turning point in the competition between established firms and newcomers. Newcomers become conservative as they elevate their status in the conventional market, whereas established firms are freed from previous constraints and consequently find it easier to adopt new strategies. However, not every established firm can seize the opportunity to recover, or rather, make the necessary change to new attributes. An 'integrated' organisational structure sometimes becomes a fundamental factor for employing an appropriate technology-portfolio strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Masaaki Sakamoto & Shuzo Fujimura, 2010. "How can established firms survive technological discontinuities? A case study on the Japanese rechargeable battery industry," International Journal of Business Environment, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3), pages 329-348.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbenv:v:3:y:2010:i:3:p:329-348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=34827
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbenv:v:3:y:2010:i:3:p:329-348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=69 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.