IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbema/v7y2015i3p223-236.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A systemic approach to talent management: managers' perceptions versus employees'

Author

Listed:
  • Ruta Daciulyte
  • Katazina Stankevich

Abstract

Talent management has been widely applied by the companies aiming to gain competitive advantage. Hence, the paper aims to reveal if systemic approach to talent management prevails. Grounded on theoretical considerations two studies were conducted. First, a sample comprised of the leaders and HR managers expressed the assumptions about talent management program. Second, a sample, comprised of employees, reported on the major aspects of talent management program. The analysis of qualitative and quantitative data let us reveal inconsistent approach towards talent management. The survey of leaders and HR managers revealed more positive attitude towards talent management than the survey of employees. The survey of employees discloses higher perceived importance and lower perceived effectiveness of prevailing talent management system. The main problems related with talent management system are linked to inefficient career planning, promotion and motivation of talented employees. The paper provides managers' insights into the systemic approach to talent management.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruta Daciulyte & Katazina Stankevich, 2015. "A systemic approach to talent management: managers' perceptions versus employees'," International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(3), pages 223-236.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbema:v:7:y:2015:i:3:p:223-236
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=70337
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbema:v:7:y:2015:i:3:p:223-236. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=249 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.