IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbeaf/v3y2012i3-4p221-243.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From behavioural to emotional corporate finance: a new research direction

Author

Listed:
  • Richard John Fairchild

Abstract

Behavioural finance and behavioural corporate finance analyses the effects of psychological biases, heuristics, and emotions on investors' and managers' decision-making and performance. Taffler and Tuckett (2005) have introduced a major paradigm shift by introducing a new field of research, namely emotional finance. This ground-breaking approach employs Freud's theory of phantastic objects to analyse the effect of unconscious, infantile, emotions on investors' decisions. In this paper, we extend their work by proposing a new development, namely, emotional corporate finance. We argue that, just as investors may view investments as phantastic objects, managers may view their projects similarly. We develop a formal approach that considers the effects of managerial phantasy on the investment appraisal decision, project performance, and managerial entrapment in a losing project. Our main results are as follows: 1) managerial project-phantasy may induce a manager to mistakenly invest in value-reducing projects; b) phantasy may lead to volatility of managerial emotions, and hence volatility of project performance; c) phantasy may lead to project entrapment, but may result in project abandonment if the manager's project-phantasy turns to project hatred. We conclude by considering whether managerial phantasy could explain management's entrapment in the Concorde project.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard John Fairchild, 2012. "From behavioural to emotional corporate finance: a new research direction," International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3/4), pages 221-243.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbeaf:v:3:y:2012:i:3/4:p:221-243
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=52191
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbeaf:v:3:y:2012:i:3/4:p:221-243. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=237 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.