IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbeaf/v2y2011i3-4p259-272.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What influences investors' perceptions of private equity firm window dressing at IPO?

Author

Listed:
  • Donald Ross
  • Mike Hopkins

Abstract

Fear of private equity (PE) firms 'putting lipstick on the pig' when divesting investee companies is common in the IPO investor market. PE firms wishing to maximise their exit value showcase investee companies in the best possible light. While PE firms are thought to add considerable value to investee companies, substantial concerns have been voiced over cash stripping, accounting manipulation and short-term cost cutting to maximise reported profits. This study used a judgement experiment and qualitative interviews with buy-side financial analysts to investigate how the characteristics of the PE firm and its involvement with the investee company influence IPO investors' decision making. The research confirms buy-side analyst concerns over window dressing to be real and exacerbated by evidence of intense PE firm involvement over short durations of time. Concerns can be mitigated, however, by positive signals of future prospects, notably the degree of retained ownership and perceived PE firm quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Donald Ross & Mike Hopkins, 2011. "What influences investors' perceptions of private equity firm window dressing at IPO?," International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3/4), pages 259-272.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbeaf:v:2:y:2011:i:3/4:p:259-272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=45016
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbeaf:v:2:y:2011:i:3/4:p:259-272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=237 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.