IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbcrm/v8y2018i2p87-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk management to avoid project failure: a comparison study of construction projects in the GCC

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad Yousef Areiqat
  • Asaad Alali
  • Yousef Arikat

Abstract

This study aims to identify the basic failure and success factors of construction projects in the six Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries using secondary and qualitative data, articles, journals and case studies to draw some conclusions. The study found that falling oil prices have a significant impact on projects because they affect their financial support and that poor risk management caused delays and cost overruns. Additionally, the lack of a well-established plan or good planning before commencing the project leads to delays and ultimately project failure. Recommendations and conclusions, such as increasing and improving the risk management training necessary to predict and avoid the deeper risks in different projects, are based on the analysis and the understanding of the literature review and case studies. Setting up alternative back-up plans in the event the project fails and PESTEL risk analysis, which focuses on multidimensional factors, should be used.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad Yousef Areiqat & Asaad Alali & Yousef Arikat, 2018. "Risk management to avoid project failure: a comparison study of construction projects in the GCC," International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(2), pages 87-105.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:8:y:2018:i:2:p:87-105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=92910
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:8:y:2018:i:2:p:87-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=333 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.