IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbcrm/v7y2017i2p113-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Tip of the iceberg in white-collar crime convictions: lack of detection or lack of prosecution

Author

Listed:
  • Petter Gottschalk
  • Lars Gunnesdal

Abstract

Based on the research method of expert elicitation, the tip of the iceberg in white-collar crime in Norway is estimated at 10%. We know that the magnitude of convicted white-collar crime is 696 million Norwegian kroner (approximately $87 million). Given that these convicts only represent 10% of the estimated offender population, the total magnitude of white-collar crime in Norway is 6.96 billion Norwegian kroner (approximately $870 million). With a population of 5 million inhabitants as compared to the USA with 321 million inhabitants, the equivalent of $870 million detected in Norway would be $56 billion in the USA. Lack of detection is the main reason for the size of the iceberg under the water, followed by lack of investigation, lack of prosecution, and lack of conviction.

Suggested Citation

  • Petter Gottschalk & Lars Gunnesdal, 2017. "Tip of the iceberg in white-collar crime convictions: lack of detection or lack of prosecution," International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 113-126.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:113-126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=86068
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:113-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=333 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.