IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbcrm/v3y2012i4p306-326.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling communication network effect on emergency evacuation times: public vs. personal

Author

Listed:
  • Michael E. Long
  • Patrick N. Morabito
  • Bernard P. Brooks
  • Jennifer L. Schneider

Abstract

Unexpected, catastrophic events initially result in anxiety and confusion. The congestion of pedestrians and vehicles further exacerbates the already turbulent environment. This uncertainty results in a chaotic site of victims, curiosity seekers, emergency responders, and mere transient individuals. Initial public announcements are often delayed, inaccurate, and met with skepticism and disbelief. However, interpersonal communications, although potentially less accurate, may have a greater influence on behaviour. With this in mind, an agent-based model was developed that included vehicle movement on roadways with traffic lights and stop signs, a disaster site, evacuation sites, and communication systems consisting of both public broadcast and personal communication networks. As an extension of earlier work, we explored the effect of the public announcement control variables and contrasted the results with those from a personal communication network. In addition, the model is thoroughly explored, explained, and shown to demonstrate the potential for improved site evacuation via personal communication networks, i.e., cell phones.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael E. Long & Patrick N. Morabito & Bernard P. Brooks & Jennifer L. Schneider, 2012. "Modelling communication network effect on emergency evacuation times: public vs. personal," International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(4), pages 306-326.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:3:y:2012:i:4:p:306-326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=51867
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:3:y:2012:i:4:p:306-326. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=333 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.