IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbcrm/v11y2021i2-3p237-246.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An analysis on public participation in an agrarian reform program in Jenawi Sub-district of Karanganyar Regency

Author

Listed:
  • Winarti
  • Joko Suranto
  • Budiman Widodo

Abstract

Presidential Regulation Number 86 of 2018 is about agrarian reform. Land reform program using holistic approach is an asset reform and access reform approach. This research aims to analyse public participation in a agrarian reform program implementation in Jenawi Sub-district of Karanganyar Regency, Central Java. The research method used was descriptive qualitative research, to find out, to analyze and to describe public participation in the agrarian reform program implementation. Cohen and Uphoff (1977) confirmed that public participation in development process consists of: 1) participation in decision making; 2) participation in implementation; 3) participation in benefits, and, 4) participation in evaluation. The result of the research showed that public participation occurs in the implementation of agrarian reform program only, but the coordination has not been effective yet between Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Office and Trading Office. The result of the research recommends 1) the need for the coordination between related units in the agrarian reform implementation, and, 2) the socialisation of program is important to do in order to understand and to participate actively.

Suggested Citation

  • Winarti & Joko Suranto & Budiman Widodo, 2021. "An analysis on public participation in an agrarian reform program in Jenawi Sub-district of Karanganyar Regency," International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(2/3), pages 237-246.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:11:y:2021:i:2/3:p:237-246
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=116282
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:11:y:2021:i:2/3:p:237-246. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=333 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.