IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijbbmi/v5y2026i2p143-168.html

Mapping technostress and digital burnout through the TCCM lens: a structured review of employee well-being and performance studies

Author

Listed:
  • Y. Suryanarayana Murthy
  • Sairoop Allena
  • A. Narasimha Rao

Abstract

This paper critically reviews research on technostress and digital burnout, focusing on their implications for employee well-being and productivity. Using bibliometric techniques (Biblioshiny and VOSviewer), it analyses Scopus-indexed studies from 2000 to 2025 to map publication trends, intellectual structures, and collaboration networks. The findings are integrated with the TCCM framework to provide deeper insights beyond descriptive analysis. Results show that the literature is largely grounded in the technostress model, the job demands-resources model, and the Conservation of Resources theory, with limited integration of emerging perspectives, such as digital well-being and resilience. Empirical studies are concentrated in IT-intensive sectors and developed regions, while South Asia remains underexplored. Although key constructs, such as technostress creators and emotional exhaustion, are well established, reliance on cross-sectional designs limits understanding of dynamic processes. The study identifies gaps in theory, context, and methodology, and proposes directions for future research to promote healthier digital workplaces.

Suggested Citation

  • Y. Suryanarayana Murthy & Sairoop Allena & A. Narasimha Rao, 2026. "Mapping technostress and digital burnout through the TCCM lens: a structured review of employee well-being and performance studies," International Journal of Bibliometrics in Business and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(2), pages 143-168.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbbmi:v:5:y:2026:i:2:p:143-168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=157160
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijbbmi:v:5:y:2026:i:2:p:143-168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=447 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.