IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Male vs. female labour in an agroforestry system in the central highlands of Kenya: correcting the misconception

Listed author(s):
  • J.M. Njuki
  • V.B.M. Kihiyo
  • A. O'Ktingati
  • F. Place

A study of male and female labour on food and cash crops was carried out in an agroforestry system in the Central Highlands of Kenya. The study tested the hypotheses that farmers concentrate most of their labour on crops with the highest gross margins whilst women concentrate most of their labour on food crops and males concentrate most of their labour on cash crops. A time allocation study was carried out over a seven month period during the short rain season of 1999-2000. Coffee was found to have the highest gross margin and to be the most labour intensive crop. However, gross margin alone cannot be taken as the only determinant of the labour allocated to a particular crop. Also important in determining the labour allocation to crops may be the importance of the crop and its labour requirements. Female labour was found to be significantly higher than male labour in all crops other than coffee. Women contributed 67% of the labour used in cash crops, which also comprised 78% of the total female labour on crops. Male labour on cash crops was 79.7% of the total male labour on all crops. The activities that were performed by men in male managed farms were found to be performed by women in female managed farms implying substitutability of male labour by female labour in the female managed and female-headed households.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Inderscience Enterprises Ltd in its journal Int. J. of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology.

Volume (Year): 3 (2004)
Issue (Month): 1/2 ()
Pages: 154-170

in new window

Handle: RePEc:ids:ijarge:v:3:y:2004:i:1/2:p:154-170
Contact details of provider: Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijarge:v:3:y:2004:i:1/2:p:154-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Darren Simpson)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.