IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accounting choices of distressed firms during debt renegotiation: evidence from Malaysia


  • Norman Mohd-Saleh
  • Kamran Ahmed


Prior economics literature suggests that managers of distressed firms have incentives to opportunistically misrepresent performance in debt renegotiation because creditors suffer from an asymmetric information problem. This paper examines the assets write-off behaviour of Malaysian firms during debt renegotiation with lenders, following actual default in loan payment. This investigation is undertaken in the context of high government intervention and a lack of proper accounting standards on intangible and fixed assets write-offs. The results show that firms wrote off more assets in the first year of debt renegotiation with lenders compared with a control of sample of firms that were not involved in debt renegotiation. This result is robust after controlling for performance, audit qualification, audit quality, management changes, size and leverage in multivariate regression models. However, we find limited support that the firms undertaking renegotiation under government supervision write off assets more than the firms without government supervision.

Suggested Citation

  • Norman Mohd-Saleh & Kamran Ahmed, 2007. "Accounting choices of distressed firms during debt renegotiation: evidence from Malaysia," International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(6), pages 589-607.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijaape:v:4:y:2007:i:6:p:589-607

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.


    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.

    Cited by:

    1. Andrea Caputo & Alberto Tron, 2016. "The attestation of corporate turnaround plans in Italy: operating problems and possible solutions," International Journal of Critical Accounting, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 8(1), pages 30-44.


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijaape:v:4:y:2007:i:6:p:589-607. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Carmel O'Grady). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.