Tests of the incremental explanatory power of auditor qualified opinion and audit firm changes in predicting impending bankruptcy
This paper investigates the incremental explanatory power of auditor-qualified opinions and auditor changes in log-linear logistic regression prediction of impending bankruptcy. We find that auditor-qualified opinions and auditor changes, both individually and jointly, provide incremental explanatory power beyond that conveyed by traditional financial ratios in predicting impending bankruptcy. The result of this study supports our prior expectations that failing firms are leaning toward changing auditors more than do healthier firms. Our findings offer compelling evidence that auditor changes provide incremental explanatory power in predicting impending firm failure beyond what is conveyed by joint consideration of auditor-qualified opinions and traditional financial statement ratios.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 3 (2006)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=41|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijaape:v:3:y:2006:i:4:p:434-451. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Graham Langley)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.