IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijaape/v18y2022i1p1-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Factors inhibiting effective organisational performance management: insights from the South African public sector

Author

Listed:
  • Asogan Moodley
  • Barry Ackers
  • Elza Odendaal

Abstract

Despite a quarter of a century of democracy, the South African government continues facing civil unrest relating to poor delivery of public goods and services. To address this deficiency, the South African government adopted organisational performance management (OPM), as a tool to improve strategic management and operational performance. Despite this directive, service delivery does not appear to have improved, as evidenced by ongoing service delivery protests. The study therefore aims to determine the factors inhibiting the effective implementation of OPM, accordingly impairing service delivery. The study which adopts a multiphase mixed methods research approach, utilises both quantitative and qualitative data collected through surveys, interviews and focus groups, as well as from a content analysis of pertinent documents and records. Non-alignment between planning and budgeting, focusing on outcomes rather than impacts, the adoption of a compliance-driven orientation rather than focusing on effective organisational performance, inadequate stakeholder management, poor technical skills, and a lack of effective consequence management were identified amongst the factors inhibiting OPM and effective service delivery.

Suggested Citation

  • Asogan Moodley & Barry Ackers & Elza Odendaal, 2022. "Factors inhibiting effective organisational performance management: insights from the South African public sector," International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 18(1), pages 1-27.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijaape:v:18:y:2022:i:1:p:1-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=123297
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijaape:v:18:y:2022:i:1:p:1-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=41 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.