IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijaape/v11y2015i1p84-105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Differences in earnings management between audited and non-audited private manufacturing firms: evidence from Greece

Author

Listed:
  • Vasileios Zisis
  • John Sorros

Abstract

Using the level of discretionary accruals as a proxy of earnings management, we provide empirical results related to the extent of earnings management among a sample of audited and non-audited non-listed manufacturing Greek firms. In accordance with our expectations of the importance and the effect of external auditing on financial reporting, we observe that private firms that are obliged to provide non-audited financial statements report higher (lower) levels of discretionary accruals during upward (downward) earnings management compared to audited private firms. Moreover, we provide evidence consistent with the argument that some non-audited firms that are close to satisfying the criteria of statutory audit manage earnings in a direction that helps them miss the accounting related criteria. However, we fail to detect that external auditing confines the use of abnormal accruals in cases of debt issue. This result also contradicts our expectation that the low level of financial transparency that is driven by the non-publication of interim financial statements will demotivate private firms to manage earnings when raising debt capital.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasileios Zisis & John Sorros, 2015. "Differences in earnings management between audited and non-audited private manufacturing firms: evidence from Greece," International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 11(1), pages 84-105.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijaape:v:11:y:2015:i:1:p:84-105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=68080
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijaape:v:11:y:2015:i:1:p:84-105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=41 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.