Author
Abstract
This paper explores some of the processes and debates about globalisation, especially about economic and financial globalisation. It suggests that while economics has been slow to respond to its development, there are at least two ways economics can contribute to the globalisation debate. First, economics has been important in questioning the idea of a new era, showing that, if there is anything in the term globalisation, it is part of a much longer process than the last twenty or thirty years. And economics has had its own experience with proclaiming "new eras", and there are lessons to be learnt from understanding why these notions proved to be illusory. The paper also suggests that the globalisation debate has been forcing economics to revisit many questions that were thought to have been "solved" half a century or more ago. In doing so, economists will find that they can also benefit greatly from the insights developed by earlier debates and other fields of research. The paper begins by discussing the ways other branches of social science have developed discussions of globalisation and the response of economists. It suggests reasons why the development of globalisation has represented such a crisis for economics. It then presents some stylised facts of globalisation, and possible ways around the paradoxes it raises. But there are still important things that economics can contribute to discussions about globalisation. Indeed, there are important lessons from earlier developments in economics that can show the pitfalls for current research on globalisation.
Suggested Citation
Michael Rafferty, 2001.
"The globalisation of business and economics,"
Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(1), pages 157-174.
Handle:
RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:3:y:2001:i:1:p:157-174
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:3:y:2001:i:1:p:157-174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=168 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.