IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/gbusec/v33y2025i3-4p253-281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparative study in fintech on the financial performance of ICO versus IEO and IDO during a shifting macroeconomic environment

Author

Listed:
  • Simona Mihai-Yiannaki
  • Georgios Trypidakis

Abstract

The study examines ICOs in comparison to alternative models, IEOs and IDOs and analyses their initial price returns during positive and downtrend macroeconomic conditions and market sentiments. We performed a cross sectional multiple case study analysis of blockchain financing models and launchpads, identified the differences and overall performance with focus on ROI% and risk adjusted return (Sharpe ratio). Results confirm that choosing a launchpad influences returns for the project and initial investors, since launchpad procedures are not standardised, their average ROI has fluctuated during a macro-economic shift in the markets, but not to the level of the change in the risk adjusted return. Both investors and issuers can leverage these insights to make data informed decision about the potential impact of future macroeconomic conditions on the token's returns of blockchain crowdfunding models and understand which fits their risk appetite. The study is the only comparison of different ICO models during increase crypto adoption.

Suggested Citation

  • Simona Mihai-Yiannaki & Georgios Trypidakis, 2025. "A comparative study in fintech on the financial performance of ICO versus IEO and IDO during a shifting macroeconomic environment," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 33(3/4), pages 253-281.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:33:y:2025:i:3/4:p:253-281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=148360
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:33:y:2025:i:3/4:p:253-281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.