IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/gbusec/v32y2025i3p298-327.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding value in social sciences: a review and research agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Renata Klafke
  • Maik Arnold
  • Claudia Picinin
  • Sandra Moreira

Abstract

This paper revises some theoretical literature of value in three different, although connected, areas: management (focus in marketing), sociology and economics. This paper also aims to show how value concept unfolds and intersected over time. It also places value in the marketing literature, for its recent field of study, compared to economics. Most downloaded papers from ten top journals were browsed. Seminal papers in business, sociology, and economics were read and some articles from SCImago (top ten business journals). All three sciences share the different meanings of the concept of value. In economics, value is more or less related to the idea of benefit vs. cost. Sociology understands value as something subjective inherently associated with human beings; the self, whereas marketing focuses on value as a strategy towards an end. In marketing literature, we find much evidence of the idea of creating unique experiences 'of value' for customers.

Suggested Citation

  • Renata Klafke & Maik Arnold & Claudia Picinin & Sandra Moreira, 2025. "Understanding value in social sciences: a review and research agenda," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 32(3), pages 298-327.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:298-327
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=145243
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:32:y:2025:i:3:p:298-327. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.