IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/gbusec/v25y2021i3-4p313-330.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Humour use in the workplace: a key to achievements or a Trojan horse of harassment?

Author

Listed:
  • Paschalia Patsala
  • Anastasia Lampreli
  • Constantinos-Vasilios Priporas

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is multi-faceted: it fundamentally aims to explore the use of humorous discourse in work environment, focusing mainly on gender and age differences. Within this context, the present work uncovers nuanced and significant communication tactics applied both by males and females in business lieu. It also discusses whether humour in the workplace constitutes an innocent form of entertainment, or it may have adverse consequences for employees, disguising the biased and derogatory essence of the remarks made. The types and manifold functions of humour are presented, unravelling the positive and negative outcomes of its usage. Particular emphasis is placed on those features of humorous interaction at work that can lead to harassing episodes, as well as on the consequences of sexist humour. Other issues elaborated on in the paper are gender differences, stereotypes, organisational tension and confrontation, as well as the culture of tolerance of sexism in professional contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Paschalia Patsala & Anastasia Lampreli & Constantinos-Vasilios Priporas, 2021. "Humour use in the workplace: a key to achievements or a Trojan horse of harassment?," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 25(3/4), pages 313-330.
    • Handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:25:y:2021:i:3/4:p:313-330
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=118707
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:25:y:2021:i:3/4:p:313-330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.