IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/gbusec/v21y2019i2p194-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-entry ongoing organisational changes of foreign subsidiaries and survival: does self-selection matter?

Author

Listed:
  • Kyungho Kim

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between the strategy choice of organisational change and the subsequent organisational survival by accounting for the self-selection. This study employed the outward 2525 firm-year foreign direct investments by Korean textile firms from 1986 to 1995, during which labour-intensive Korean firms in the textile industry largely depend on outward foreign direct investment to explore foreign opportunities in developing countries while avoiding increasing labour costs in the domestic market. This study applied a self-selection model introduced by Heckman (1979) to test the strategy choice problem. The results without accounting for self-selection show that organisational change in product areas and investment amount have a significant and negative relationship with the mortality rate of a foreign subsidiary, while organisational change in ownership rate does not. When accounting for self-selection, however, the former effects disappear, whereas the latter effect becomes positively significant, suggesting that the effect of strategy choice of organisational change depends on whether unobserved firm attributes and environmental conditions, as well as the type of organisational change, are accounted for in the analytic model.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyungho Kim, 2019. "Post-entry ongoing organisational changes of foreign subsidiaries and survival: does self-selection matter?," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 21(2), pages 194-218.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:21:y:2019:i:2:p:194-218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=98084
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:21:y:2019:i:2:p:194-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.