IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/gbusec/v20y2018i4p485-502.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Violations of put-call parity for CNX Nifty index options: a study at National Stock Exchange

Author

Listed:
  • Tanuj Nandan
  • Puja Agrawal

Abstract

Derivatives markets provide a platform for market participants to hedge their risk, and aid price discovery. Correct pricing of derivatives instruments is imperative in the performance of these functions. In the present study, an attempt has been made to examine the valuation of CNX Nifty index options in terms of put-call parity (PCP) relationship, over a ten-year period. Since PCP is a no-arbitrage-based argument, it does not suffer from the limitations that are inevitable while gauging pricing efficiency using model-based approaches. Various error estimates, supported by non-parametric tests have been used validate our results statistically. Our findings indicate frequent violations of PCP, though the magnitude of mispricing is small. Further, the results are charted across moneyness, days-to-expiry and liquidity. The present study can be extremely important for all stakeholders, as violation of PCP leads to risk-free profitable arbitrage, which is an antithesis to efficient markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanuj Nandan & Puja Agrawal, 2018. "Violations of put-call parity for CNX Nifty index options: a study at National Stock Exchange," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(4), pages 485-502.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:20:y:2018:i:4:p:485-502
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=92765
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:20:y:2018:i:4:p:485-502. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.