IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/gbusec/v20y2018i3p263-285.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Explaining payment amounts among self-selected pay-what-you-want-buyers: results from a field experiment in Germany

Author

Listed:
  • Torsten J. Gerpott

Abstract

This work analyses actual payments of consumers who consciously choose a pay-what-you-want (PWYW) offer in a situation in which a posted price substitute was also available. In a between-person field experiment, we sell two types of freshly prepared sweet treats. In the first experimental condition, we offer waffles under PWYW and in parallel crêpes at a posted price. In the second condition, we reverse the allocation of the pricing methods to the two focal treats. Our sweet snacks stand attracts a total of 288 different customers of whom 158 deliberately buy an item offered under PWYW. We find that, on average, PWYW buyers pay about 15% more than the regular price posted for the similar sales alternative. 56% of the PWYW customers pay exactly the price posted for the close substitute sold in addition to the PWYW item. PWYW prices rise, as buyers are more concerned about fairly treating the seller and are less price-conscious. PWYW amounts decrease, as buyers view the PWYW method primarily as an opportunity to make a bargain and know the seller in person. We discuss implications of the results for practical PWYW applications in organisations and for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Torsten J. Gerpott, 2018. "Explaining payment amounts among self-selected pay-what-you-want-buyers: results from a field experiment in Germany," Global Business and Economics Review, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 20(3), pages 263-285.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:20:y:2018:i:3:p:263-285
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=91706
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:20:y:2018:i:3:p:263-285. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.